DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
M-CV-0085525·placer·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing in about 4 hoursDropped from calendar

McDONALD, TAMMY v. CAREY, JAMIE

motion for order directing defendant to turnover property to levying officer

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTAMMY McDONALD
DefendantJAMIE CAREY

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 28, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

These are the tentative rulings for the FRIDAY, AUGUST 28, 2026 at 8:30 A.M., civil law and motion calendar. The tentative ruling will be the court’s final ruling unless notice of appearance and request for oral argument are given to all parties and the court by 4:00 p.m., THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2026. Notice of request for argument to the court must be made by calling (916) 408-6481. Requests for oral argument made by any other method will not be accepted. Prevailing parties are required to submit orders after hearing to the court within 10 court days of the scheduled hearing date and approval as to form by opposing counsel. Court reporters are not provided by the court. Parties may provide a court reporter at their own expense.

NOTE: PARTIES MAY REQUEST A REMOTE APPEARANCE FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. (PLACER COURT LOCAL RULE 10.24.) More information is available at the court’s website: www.placer.courts.ca.gov.

Except as otherwise noted, these tentative rulings are issued by COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR. If oral argument is requested, it shall be heard at 8:30 a.m. in DEPARTMENT 1 located at the Historic Auburn Courthouse, 101 Maple Street, Auburn, California.

1. M-CV-0085525 McDONALD, TAMMY v. CAREY, JAMIE

The motion for order directing defendant to turnover property to levying officer is dropped from calendar as no moving papers were filed with the court.

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share