DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678188·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. ADAM CHARLES BARNETT ET AL

Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Dec 24, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 14, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC
DefendantADAM CHARLES BARNETT

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678188 - December 24, 2025 Hearing date: December 24, 2025 Case number: CUD25678188 Case title: GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. ADAM CHARLES BARNETT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678188 | Case Title: | | GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. ADAM CHARLES BARNETT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 24, 2025.

Line 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation is continued to January 14, 2026 per the order of the presiding judge.=(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share