DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2024-01395971·orange·ComplexCivil·Class Action — Wage & Hour
Hearing todayGRANTED

Reyes v. Bioseal

Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
CX105
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Next hearing
Oct 7, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$550,000$5,000.00$183,333.33$22,635.39$7,450.00

Parties

PlaintiffReyes
DefendantBioseal

Ruling

1

LAW & MOTION CALENDAR TENTATIVE RULINGS

August 27, 2026

Judge Melissa R. McCormick Dept. CX105

Department CX105 hears law and motion on Thursdays at 2:00 p.m.

Court reporters: Official court reporters typically are not provided in this department for any proceedings. If the parties desire the services of a court reporter, the parties should follow the procedures set forth on the court’s website at www.occourts.org.

Tentative rulings: The court endeavors to post tentative rulings on the court’s website by 9:00 a.m. the day of the hearing. Tentative rulings may not be posted in every case. Please do not call the department for tentative rulings if tentative rulings have not been posted.

Submitting on tentative rulings: If all parties intend to submit on the tentative ruling and do not desire oral argument, please advise the courtroom clerk or courtroom attendant by calling (657) 622- 5305. Please do not call the department unless all parties submit on the tentative ruling. If all parties submit on the tentative ruling and so advise the court, the tentative ruling will become the court’s final ruling, and the prevailing party shall give notice of the ruling.

Appearances and public access: Appearances, whether in person or remote, must comply with Civil Procedure Code section 367.75, California Rule of Court 3.672, Orange County Superior Court Local Rule 375, and Orange County Superior Court Appearance Procedure and Information—Civil Unlimited and Complex (pub. 9/9/22).

Unless the court orders otherwise, remote appearances will be conducted via Zoom. All counsel and selfrepresented parties appearing via Zoom must check in through the court’s civil remote appearance website before the hearing begins. Check-in instructions are available on the court’s website.

The public may attend hearings by coming to court or via remote access as described above.

Photographing, filming, recording and/or broadcasting court proceedings are prohibited unless authorized pursuant to California Rule of Court 1.150 or Orange County Superior Court Local Rule 180.

Non-appearances: If nobody appears for the hearing and the court has not been notified that all parties submit on the tentative ruling, the court shall determine whether the matter is taken off calendar or the tentative ruling becomes the final ruling. The court also might make a different order. See Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc. (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 436, 442 n.1.

NO. CASE NAME MATTER

Harris v. Orange County Transportation Authority

2022-01284718

Off calendar. 2 Reyes v. Bioseal

2024-01395971

Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement The court has reviewed and considered the papers filed in support of plaintiff’s motion for final approval of a $550,000 class action settlement. The court grants the motion as follows:

$5,000.00 for enhancement award to plaintiff; $183,333.33.00 for attorneys’ fees; $22,635.39 for litigation costs (Blakely Decl. (ROA 90) Ex. D); and $7,450.00 for settlement administration costs. Plaintiff is ordered to submit by September 3, 2026 a revised proposed order and judgment (including the above amounts) that includes in paragraph 5 the names of the six individuals who optedout of the settlement. The final accounting hearing is scheduled for October 7, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX105.

Plaintiff shall submit a final accounting report at least 9 court days before the final accounting hearing regarding the status of the settlement administration. The final report must include all information necessary for the court to determine the total amount actually paid to class members and aggrieved employees and any amounts tendered to the State Controller’s Office under the unclaimed property law. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice and to file a proof of service. 3 Sandoval v. W Brothers Landscape, Inc.

2024-01426168

Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement The court has reviewed and considered the papers filed in support of plaintiff’s motion for final approval of a $470,000 class action and PAGA settlement. The court grants the motion as follows: $2,500.00 for enhancement award to plaintiff; $141,000.00 for attorneys’ fees; $19,003.80 for litigation costs; $4,990.00 for settlement administration costs; and $35,000.00 total PAGA penalties ($22,750.00 to the LWDA). The final accounting hearing is scheduled for March 18, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX105.

Plaintiff shall submit a final accounting report at least 9 court days before the final accounting hearing regarding the status of the settlement administration. The final report must include all information necessary for the court to determine the total amount actually paid to class members and aggrieved employees and any amounts tendered to the State Controller’s Office under the unclaimed property law. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice, including to the LWDA, and to file a proof of service. 4 South Coast Shipyard, Inc. v.

NPB Marina LLC, et al.

2017-00910966

Plaintiffs’ Request for Entry of Proposed Judgment Following a jury verdict largely in their favor on their negligence and nuisance claims, plaintiffs South Coast Shipyard, Inc. and Peter Stewart submitted a proposed judgment addressing the damages awarded by the jury and seeking entry of an injunction by the court. ROA 1948. Plaintiffs filed a brief in support of their

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share