In re Crescent Capital Solutions Corp.
Dismissal
Motion type
Ruling
before the designated hearing time. Once the online check-in is completed, participants will be prompted to join the courtroom’s Zoom hearing session. Participants will initially be directed to a virtual waiting room pending the start of their specific video hearing. Check-in instructions and instructional video are available at. The Court’s “Appearance Procedures and Information--Civil Unlimited and Complex” and “Guidelines for Remote Appearances” also are available at. Those procedures and guidelines will be strictly enforced.
Public Access: The courtroom remains open for all evidentiary and non-evidentiary proceedings. Members of the media or public may obtain access to law and motion hearings in this department by either coming to the department at the designated hearing time or contacting the courtroom clerk at (657) 622-5223 to obtain login information. For remote appearances by the media or public, please contact the courtroom clerk 24 hours in advance so as not to interrupt the hearings.
NO FILMING, BROADCASTING, PHOTOGRAPHY, OR ELECTRONIC RECORDING IS PERMITTED OF THE VIDEO SESSION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 1.150 AND ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT RULE 180.
# Case Name Case Number Tentative 1. In re Crescent Capital Solutions Corp. 2026-01577523 OFF CALENDAR based on request for dismissal filed on August 4, 2026.
2. In Re: Barocio 2026-01559770 Before the court is the continued hearing on the petition of petitioner Shephard Douglas, LLC (Petitioner) for court approval of proposed transfer of certain periodic structured settlement payments payee Lucila Barocio (Payee) is scheduled to receive. Under the proposed transaction, Payee would transfer her rights to one lump sum payment of $20,000 due February 16, 2028, one lump sum payment of $30,000 due February 16, 2029, and one lump sum payment of $40,000 due February 16, 2030.
These payments total $90,000 and have a discounted present value of $77,892.70. In exchange for transferring the right to receive these monthly payments, Payee would receive a present, lump sum payment of $45,000, which represents 57.7 percent of the payments’ present value and equates to an equivalent interest rate of 24.7 percent if Payee were to take a loan. The court has received and reviewed the following documents and all exhibits and documents attached thereto: (1) the petition and amended petition for approval
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”