DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22FL0623·eldorado·Civil·Spousal support
Hearing todayDropped from calendar due to failure to file supplemental declarations

Jaymie Cedeno v. Rafael Cedeno

Review hearing

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJaymie Cedeno
DefendantRafael Cedeno

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 August 27, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

4. JAYMIE CEDENO V. RAFAEL CEDENO 22FL0623

On May 26, 2026, the parties appeared before the court for a long cause hearing on the issue of spousal support. At that time, the court made orders regarding support and set the matter for review hearing to address the issues of support paid and whether there should be a termination date on support. The parties were ordered to file supplemental declarations no later than 10 days prior to the hearing date.

Neither party has filed a supplemental declaration. The court drops the matter from calendar due to the failure to file supplemental declarations.

TENTATIVE RULING #4: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE FAILURE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share