DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682107·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayDENIED

SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT VS. DONALD GILLSON ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motioin For Threshold Jurisdictional - Federal Enclave/Standing

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT
DefendantDONALD GILLSON

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 27, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT DONALD GILLSON Notice Of Motion And Motioin For Threshold Jurisdictional - Federal Enclave/Standing is DENIED.

While not clear, it appears that Defendant either requests that (1) this Court determine the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts or that (2) this Court determine that this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

As to the first issue, this Court does not determine the parameters of the federal court's subject matter jurisdiction. See Plowshares v. Kemp (2005) 423 F.Supp.2d 1031. Such determinations are made by federal courts.

As to the second issue, moving party cites no authority for the proposition that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share