DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25STCV08308·la·Civil·Consumer/Lemon Law
Hearing in about 4 hoursDENIED

Quan Ding, et al. v. FCA US, LLC, et al.

Motion to Dismiss

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
510
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffQuan Ding
DefendantFCA US, LLC
DefendantJRDTSP LLC dba Scott Robinson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram

Ruling

no further payment is required as a result of this order.

Disposition

Plaintiff Jaeil Lee's motion for attorney fees is granted in part. Plaintiff shall recover $4,480 in attorney fees and $512.17 in costs from Defense counsel Henry M. Lee. [1] Plaintiff amended his initial fee request from $9,800 to $11,200 to account for time incurred drafting the reply brief. The Court will analyze the $11,200 amount when ruling on this motion.

9 - Quan Ding, et al. v. FCA US, LLC, et al. Defendants FCA US, LLC, and JRDTSP LLC deb Scott Robinson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram's Motion to Dismiss Defendants FCA US, LLC, and JRDTSP LLC dba Scott Robinson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram move to dismiss Plaintiffs' entire first amended complaint ("FAC") under Code of Civil Procedure section 581(f)(2).

On February 3, 2026, the Court sustained Defendant FCA US, LLC's demurrer to Plaintiffs' first and second causes of action as alleged in their FAC with 21 days' leave to amend. The Court overruled FCA's demurrer as to the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action.

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 581(f)(2): "The court may dismiss the complaint . . . after a demurrer to the complaint is sustained with leave to amend, the plaintiff fails to amend it within the time allowed by the court and either party moves for dismissal." (CCP Sec. 581(f)(2) [emphasis added].)

Here, the Court did not sustain the demurrer as to the entire complaint. There is no statutory basis to dismiss claims on which the demurrer was overruled. The Court will not dismiss Plaintiffs' entire action for failure to amend two of its claims.

In opposition, Plaintiffs request the Court deny dismissal of the first and second causes of action on the grounds that the rationale guiding the Court's ruling on demurrer is currently under appellate review in a separate case. This argument misunderstands the Court's ruling and its consequences.

The Court sustained the demurrer as to these claims with 21 days' leave to amend. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint within the time allotted. Therefore, these claims are no longer operative in this action. This is due to Plaintiff's inaction, not any action by the Court.

Disposition

Defendants FCA US, LLC, and JRDTSP LLC dba Scott Robinson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram's motion to dismiss is denied. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share