SWISH ANALYTICS, INC. VS. ODDSJAM, INC. ET AL

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24621009 - August 27, 2026 Hearing date: August 27, 2026 Case number: CGC24621009 Case title: SWISH ANALYTICS, INC. VS. ODDSJAM, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24621009 | Case Title: | | SWISH ANALYTICS, INC. VS. ODDSJAM, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-27 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Responses To Plaintiff'S Second Set Of Special Interrogatories | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for August 27, 2026, line 4. PLAINTIFF SWISH ANALYTICS, INC.'S Motion To Compel Responses To Plaintiff's Second Set Of Special Interrogatories.

Swish Analytics Inc.'s motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories is denied as to interrogatory 7 and granted as to 8. No sanctions are awarded. Swish's meet and confer efforts were sufficient.

With respect to 7, defendants Oddsjam Inc. and Opticodds Inc.'s (collectively Oddsjam) responses are sufficiently complete and responsive. Swish requested information about preservation of log data and the existence of log data as of December 20, 2024. Oddsjam responded that its software does not create logs. It further explained that it does not consider odds data to be logs, but described what it has done to preserve odds data since that date. Oddsjam's reading of the interrogatory is reasonable.

With respect to 8, in response to a request for monthly revenues, Oddsjam produced incomplete documentation and relied on Code of Civil Procedure, section 2030.230. Swish shows that the referenced documents do not fully and completely respond to the interrogatory and that Oddsjam has the ability to answer the interrogatory at least partially and more fully as to revenue, including revenue from enterprise clients. (Kowalski Decl., Exs. 22-24.) In addition, Oddsjam does not respond to the portion of the interrogatory concerning attribution of revenue to other entities. Oddsjam shall amend by September 8, 2026. No sanctions are awarded; both parties' discovery position had substantial justification.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |