Latonia Vaughan vs. Karma Apartments
Demurrer to Cross-Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
34-2023-00334089-CU-BC-GDS: Latonia Vaughan vs. Karma Apartments 08/04/2026 Hearing on Demurrer to Cross-Complaint in Department 16D
Tentative Ruling
NOTICE: Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure: To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Department 16D Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-3056 by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message (a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; (b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and (c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing party may appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below.
If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court. Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by video conference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court will presume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings.
The Department 16D Zoom Link is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16146506749 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 161 4650 6749. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALL APPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED. Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed on the Court Reporter Services webpage available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://saccourt.ca.gov/general-information/court-reporter-services-transcripts.
Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://saccourt.ca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/227/639084034465370000. A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list. Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.
If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided. *** EFFECTIVE APRIL 13, 2026, THIS DEPARTMENT HAS MOVED TO THE TANI G.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 500 G STREET IN SACRAMENTO, CA 95814. ALL HEARINGS NOTICED FOR DEPARTMENT 53 WILL BE HEARD IN
34-2023-00334089-CU-BC-GDS: Latonia Vaughan vs. Karma Apartments 08/04/2026 Hearing on Demurrer to Cross-Complaint in Department 16D
DEPARTMENT 16D OF THE NEW COURTHOUSE. PARTIES MAY CONTINUE TO APPEAR REMOTELY IN DEPARTMENT 16D UNLESS SPECIFICALLY ORDERED OTHERWISE. ***
TENTATIVE RULING
The notice of demurrer does not provide the correct address for this Courts Dept. 53, now designated as Dept. 16D.
Although the notice of demurrer provides notice of the Courts tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 1.06, the notice does not comply with the specific provisions of Local Rule 1.06(D). Moving counsel directed to review the Local Court Rules, effective 7/1/2026.
Plaintiff/Cross-defendant Vaughans demurrer to the First Amended Cross-complaint of defendant Karma Apartments, LLC is on the Courts own motion CONTINUED to 9/8/2026 at 1:30 p.m. in this department because demurring plaintiff did not file and serve with this demurrer any declaration which satisfies the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure §430.41, which at the time this demurrer was filed required the demurring party to meet-and-confer in person or by telephone with the party filing the pleading that is the subject of the demurrer. (Emphasis added.)
Here, the Wood Declaration filed with this demurrer indicates that the only meet-andconfer efforts were completed by letter and/or email. However, the mere exchange of letters and/or emails does not satisfy the express statutory requirements of Code of Civil Procedure §430.41. Indeed, the purpose of in person or telephone meet-andconfer sessions is to maximize the resolution of disputes by fostering an open dialogue that is not constrained by the mere exchange of letters and/or emails.
Defendants counsel is reminded that the meet-and-confer requirements of Code of Civil Procedure §430.41 are not optional and s/he is required to participate in the meet-andconfer efforts in person, by telephone, or by videoconference even if s/he disagrees with the challenge to the pleading.
Demurring plaintiff shall pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §430.41(a) meet and confer in person, by telephone, or by videoconference with the party filing the pleading that is the subject of the demurrer and file and serve no later than 8/18/2026 a declaration in conformity with §430.41(a)(3). This declaration shall also identify any issues raised by the demurrer which have been resolved via the meetand-confer process and no longer need resolution by the Court.
Plaintiff to provide notice of this ruling and file proof of service of same within five (5) court days.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
34-2023-00334089-CU-BC-GDS: Latonia Vaughan vs. Karma Apartments 08/04/2026 Hearing on Demurrer to Cross-Complaint in Department 16D
This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required. (Code Civ. Proc. §1019.5; CRC Rule 3.1312.)
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”