DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23604649·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

JANET ELIZABETH FOWLER VS. 440 HOFFMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL

Motion To File Under Seal Defendants' Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And Enter Judgment

Hearing date
Dec 22, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 22, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJANET ELIZABETH FOWLER
Defendant440 HOFFMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23604649 - December 22, 2025 Hearing date: December 22, 2025 Case number: CGC23604649 Case title: JANET ELIZABETH FOWLER VS. 440 HOFFMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23604649 | Case Title: | | JANET ELIZABETH FOWLER VS. 440 HOFFMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To File Under Seal Defendants' Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And Enter Judgment; Memorandum Of Point And Authorities; Wu Declaration; And Silber Declaration | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 22, 2025 line 5.

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ENTER JUDGMENT is continued to January 22, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share