DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV02166·butte·Civil·Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Hearing todayGRANTED

AAA Properties v. Calagna, Samantha

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
Not specified
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAAA Properties
DefendantSamantha Calagna

Ruling

6. 25CV02166 AAA Properties v. Calagna, Samantha

EVENT: Motion to be Relieved as Counsel (Plaintiff’s Counsel)

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED. The Court will sign the proposed order. The order will become effective upon the filing of a proof of service demonstrating Plaintiff was served with the order.

7-10. 25CV05073 Marin, Armando v. California Automobile Insurance Company

EVENT: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One; Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff and/or Counsel (2) Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One; Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff and/or Counsel; (3) Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One; Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff and/or Counsel; (4) Defendant’s Motion for Order Establishing Admissions; Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff and/or Counsel;

Defendant’s discovery motions are granted. The admissions are deemed admitted. Plaintiff shall provide responses without objection to the other discovery requests within 10 days. Sanctions are awarded against Plaintiff (but not against Plaintiff’s counsel) in the total amount of $3,500 ($875 per motion). The Court will sign the proposed orders with these modifications.

5|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share