QUANTUM LENDING SOLUTIONS, INC. VS RODRIGUEZ CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION LLC

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME QUANTUM LENDING SOLUTIONS, INC. VS MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY RODRIGUEZ CUSTOM CVPS2505288 QUANTUM LENDING SOLUTIONS, CONSTRUCTION LLC, A INC. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Tentative Ruling: Granted.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITIBANK, N.A. VS MOTION FOR STIPULATED JUDGMENT CVPS2506022 REDEWILL BY CITIBANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME J.S. HELD LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED CVPS2507041 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS LIABILITY COMPANY VS LAX Tentative Ruling: Defendant/cross-complainant Martin Lax’s motion for sanctions against plaintiff/cross-defendant J.S. Held LLC and cross-defendant Kathryn A. Johnson is DENIED.

As to the motion for sanctions against plaintiff J.S. Held LLC, plaintiff states it has produced all documents. Defendant has produced nothing to indicate that is untrue. Defendant’s speculation is not a basis for the court to sanction plaintiff.

As to the motion for sanctions against cross-defendant Johnson, the court’s 4/29/2026 discovery order did not apply to her and does not provide a basis for sanctions.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ON COMPLAINT OF WELLS FARGO CVPS2508867 VS RYAN BANK, N.A. BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s unopposed motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, as is the request for judicial notice filed in support thereof.

Plaintiff sued defendant Patricia L. Ryan for breach of contract. To succeed on this claim, plaintiff must show: (1) the existence of a contract, (2) its performance under the contract or excuse for nonperformance, (3) defendant's breach, and (4) resulting damages. (Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman (2011) 51 Cal.4th 811, 821.) Here, the undisputed evidence shows: (1) plaintiff entered into a credit card agreement with defendant; (2) it performed all duties under the agreement, including issuing a card to defendant and providing monthly statements; (3) defendant breached