CARREJO VS DESERT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL INITIAL RESPONSES OF PLAINTIFF TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF COLTON VS WYNDHAM DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR CVPS2404533 DESTINATIONS, INC. SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO CCP SEC. 2030.290(C) AGAINST PLAINTIFF KRISTINE COLTON BY WORLDMARK, THE CLUB Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing is continued to consolidate all future hearings. The Motions to Compel currently set for 8.26.26, 9.01.26, 9.03.26, 9.09.26 and 9.11.26 are all continued to 9.22.26 at 8:30 a.m. Any oppositions to the motions shall be filed by 9.09.26. Any reply to be filed by 9.15.26.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT FOR CARREJO, BY AND FAILURE TO TIMELY RESPOND TO THROUGH HIS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS ON 2ND SUCCESSORS IN AMENDED COMPLAINT OF CVPS2503181 INTEREST ROSALINDA FRANCISCO CARREJO, BY AND FRAUSTO VS DESERT THROUGH HIS SUCCESSORS IN REGIONAL MEDICAL INTEREST ROSALINDA FRAUSTO BY CENTER DESERT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing continued to 9.16.26.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME LIBERTAD VS COUNTY OF DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED CVPS2504070 RIVERSIDE COMPLAINT OF URIMARE LIBERTAD Tentative Ruling: A general demurrer lies where the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (C.C.P. § 430.10(e).) In evaluating a demurrer, the court gives the pleading a reasonable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all of its parts in their context. (Moore v. Regents of University of California (1990) 51 Cal.3d 120, 125.)

The court assumes the truth of all material facts which have been properly pleaded, of facts which may be inferred from those expressly pleaded, and of any material facts of which judicial notice has been requested and may be taken. (Crowley v. Katleman (1994) 8 Cal.4th 666, 672.) However, a demurrer does not admit contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. (Daar v. Yellow Cab Company (1967) 67 Cal.2d 695, 713.) If the complaint fails to state a cause of action, the court must grant the plaintiff leave to amend if there is a reasonable possibility that the defect can be cured by amendment. (Blank v.

Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) A special demurrer lies where a pleading is uncertain, ambiguous and unintelligible. (CCP § 430.10(f).) Demurrers for uncertainty, however, are typically sustained only where the defendant cannot reasonably determine what issues must be