DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV28259·la·Civil·Class Action
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Not specified

Motion for class certification (deadline extension)

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 17, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

(Spring Street Courthouse: Dept. 9) August 26, 2026 DEPARTMENT 9 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Tentative Minute Order The Court discusses with the parties issues regarding burden and sampling with regard to the Belaire West notice and with regard to litigation of the issue concerning class members who have signed arbitration agreement. The Court has made no rulings at this time. In open court today, all parties orally stipulated to lift the stay on discovery as to putative class members who have signed arbitration agreements or are bound by a Collective Bargaining Agreement. In open court today, all parties orally stipulated to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file and serve a motion for class certification to May 10, 2027.

It is so ordered. By stipulation of the parties, the deadline for Plaintiff to file and serve a motion for class certification is CONTINUED to May 10, 2027. The Non-Appearance is continued to May 17, 2027. Defendant may file and serve a motion to deny class certification or to decertify a class at any time. Notwithstanding the stipulations above, each Party preserves all objections and arguments. Prior to finalizing this minute order, the Court posted this minute order on CaseAnywhere, and all Counsel agreed to the accuracy of this minute order in reflecting the parties' stipulations.

Plaintiff to give formal notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share