Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Interrogatories, Set No. One; Request For Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Kathleen Roney And John J. Wasinda, Esq. In The Sum Of $1,925.00
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25624342 - December 23, 2025 Hearing date: December 23, 2025 Case number: CGC25624342 Case title: ANDRE IRVING VS. KATHLEEN RONEY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624342 | Case Title: | | ANDRE IRVING VS. KATHLEEN RONEY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-23 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Interrogatories, Set No. One; Request For Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Kathleen Roney And John J.
Wasinda, Esq. In The Sum Of $1,925.00; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And [Proposed] Order; Declaration Of Nathaniel Harding, Esq. Filed Separately | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, December 23, 2025, Line 9. PLAINTIFF ANDRE IRVING Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Interrogatories, Set No. One; Request For Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Kathleen Roney And John J. Wasinda, Esq. In The Sum Of $1,925.00; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And [Proposed] Order; Declaration Of Nathaniel Harding, Esq.
Filed Separately
Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Compel Further Response to Interrogatories, Set One, et.al. is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant shall serve supplemental responses to Interrogatories 20.5, 20.6, 20.7, 20.8 and Special Interrogatory 8 within 20 days after service of the order after hearing. Plaintiff's request that further response be compelled to Interrogatory 20.3 is denied; Defendant's previous response constitutes a complete response to this interrogatory. Plaintiff's request for monetary sanctions in the amount of $1925 is granted. Defendant promised during the "meet and confer" between counsel to provide further responses to these interrogatories, yet failed to do so without substantial justification.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CM) | |