DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0053944·placer·Civil·Probate
Hearing in about 4 hoursDENIED without prejudice

IN RE THE PETITION OF DANIELLE SCHNEIDER

Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerDANIELLE SCHNEIDER

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 27, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

9. S-CV-0053944 IN RE THE PETITION OF DANIELLE SCHNEIDER

Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim

The court continued the matter on April 23, 2026, for petitioner to file a supplemental declaration that attaches the proposed annuity terms for the court’s consideration. However, the supplemental declaration filed with the court on July 17, 2026, does not include the proposed annuity terms. Thus, the court cannot determine whether the proposed annuity is in the best interest of the minor. Accordingly, the petition for approval of minor’s compromise claim is denied without prejudice.

10. S-CV-0057600 LALLISS, STEVEN v. HARRIS, LORENZO

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint

Preliminary Matters

The court observes defendant’s moving and reply papers exceed the page limit delineated in California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1113, subdivision (d). The court admonishes defendant to adhere to the applicable California Rules of Court for future filings.

Defendant’s requests for judicial notice are granted as to the existence of the documents but not any inferences drawn therefrom.

Plaintiff’s requests for judicial notice are granted.

Plaintiff’s objections are overruled in their entirety.

Defendant’s objections are overruled in their entirety.

Ruling on Motion

Defendant moves to strike the entirety of plaintiff’s complaint—which includes causes of action for (1) defamation; (2) public disclosure of private facts; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; (4) bad faith invasion of privacy; and (5) false light invasion of privacy—pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share