DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0051611·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 2 hoursDENIED

SUPREMA MEATS v. SALINAS FOOD

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSUPREMA MEATS
DefendantSALINAS FOOD
DefendantFENG XIANG ZHAO AKA TOM JAU
DefendantYIN CHEE TING
DefendantGREAT GOLDEN RIVER

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 27, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

6. S-CV-0051611 SUPREMA MEATS v. SALINAS FOOD

Defendants Feng Xiang Zhao AKA Tom Jau, Yin Chee Ting, and Great Golden River’s Motion for Summary Judgment

A motion for summary judgment must be filed and served at least 81 days before the time appointed for hearing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (a)(2).) This timeline is increased by 2 court days where, as here, the motion was served by e-mail. (Ibid.; Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6, subd. (a)(3)(B).)

The time appointed for hearing is August 27, 2026. Subtracting 81 days plus 2 court days creates a deadline to file and serve the motion for summary judgment by e-mail on or before June 4, 2026. However, defendants served their motion for summary judgment by e-mail on June 5, 2026. This is untimely.

Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied.

7. S-CV-0052150 ZOLLER, KATHIE v. DONALD RYAN AND CAROLYN RYAN

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Adjudication on the Second Cause of Action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and on the Claim for Punitive Damages

Preliminary Matters

Plaintiffs’ objections are sustained in their entirety.

Defendants’ reply brief, along with objections to plaintiffs’ evidence and a responsive separate statement to plaintiffs’ additional material facts, are untimely filed and served without explanation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (b)(4).) The court declines to consider these documents.

Ruling on Motion

Defendants move for summary adjudication as to the second cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and prayer for punitive damages as to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. A motion for summary adjudication requires a showing that there is no merit to one or more of the causes of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (f)(1).) A motion for summary adjudication proceeds “in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.” (Id. at § 437c, subd. (f)(2).)

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share