DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22STCV35791·la·Civil·N/A
Hearing todayCONTINUED

N/A

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
508
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

DATED: August 26, 2026 ________________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court

Because there is a jury trial in Dept. 508 starting at 10 a.m., the Informal Discovery Conference was moved to 12:15 p.m.

CONTINUED BECAUSE THE COURT DID NOT RECEIVE THE REQUISITE COURTESY COPIES OF THE MOVING AND REPLY PAPERS. Case Number: 25STCV08881 Hearing Date: August 26, 2026 Dept: 508 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 RHN AUTOMOTIVE INC., dba NISSANI BROS. NISSAN, Plaintiff, vs. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. | Case No.: | 25STCV08881 | Hearing Date: | August 26, 2026 | Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. ORDER RE: DEFENDANT LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL NEW GENERATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.'S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF RECORDS | Defendant Landmark American Insurance Company ("Defendant") moves for an order enforcing the Subpoena for Business Records issued to third-party New Generation Development Group, Inc., on August 14, 2025 and served on August 26, 2025, directing New Generation Development Group, Inc. to produce all records in its possession and control responsive to the subpoena.

Plaintiff also seeks monetary sanctions against New Generation Development Group, Inc. in the amount of $3,900. Defendant's motion will be continued to a new date as set forth below. NO HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE ON AUGUST 26, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share