DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25STCV21715·la·Civil·Employment
Hearing in 1 dayGRANTED

Chernyshova v. Max Benjamin Partners, Inc., et al.

Motion to Compel Compliance

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
310
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,000

Parties

PlaintiffMaria Chernyshova
DefendantMax Benjamin Partners, Inc.

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 310) August 28, 2026 DEPARTMENT 310 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS Submit on the tentative ruling by contacting the courtroom via email at [email protected] by no later than 4:00 p.m. the day before the hearing. Copy all parties on the email. The email subject line must state the case name and number, submitting or not submitting, hearing date and party type.

Judge Kevin C. Brazile Department 310 Hearing Date: August 28, 2026 Case Name: Chernyshova v. Max Benjamin Partners, Inc., et al. Case No.: 25STCV21715 Matter: Motion to Compel Compliance Moving Party: Plaintiff Maria Chernyshova Responding Party: Unopposed Notice: OK Ruling: The Motion is granted. Moving party to give notice. The Court encourages all parties to appear remotely via LA CourtConnect. If submitting on the Court's tentative ruling, please follow the instructions provided above. This is an employment action.

Plaintiff Maria Chernyshova now seeks to compel Defendant Max Benjamin Partners, Inc. to comply with the Court's discovery orders of June 1 and June 5, 2026. Because there is no opposition, the Motion is granted. Further responses are to be served within 10 days. Defendant and its counsel are jointly and severally sanctioned $1,000, which is to be paid within 30 days. Moving party to give notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share