MARCUS MONTALVO ET AL VS. MAROUEN MBAZAIA ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Compel Plaintiffs Jeanne Jazulin And Marcus Montalvo's Responses To Written Discovery
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25624775 - August 26, 2026 Hearing date: August 26, 2026 Case number: CGC25624775 Case title: MARCUS MONTALVO ET AL VS. MAROUEN MBAZAIA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624775 | Case Title: | | MARCUS MONTALVO ET AL VS. MAROUEN MBAZAIA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-26 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Compel Plaintiffs Jeanne Jazulin And Marcus Montalvo?S Responses To Written Discovery; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Nicholas A. Kirst, Esq. | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for August 26, 2026, line 3. DEFENDANT MARWEN MBAZIA'S Motion For Order To Compel Plaintiffs Jeanne Jazulin And Marcus Montalvo's Responses To Written Discovery.
Defendant Marwen Mbazia's motion to compel responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents is granted. After the motion was filed, plaintiffs Jeanne Jazulin and Marcus Montalvo filed a late opposition stating that they provided complete and verified responses, but they did not attach the responses to their filing. The court continued the hearing for Mbazia to provide a reply brief and for the parties to meet and confer. It appears that the responses are not verified and assert objections that were waived. Moreover, the motion itself was necessitated by plaintiffs' failure to timely respond to discovery. The court orders plaintiffs to provide complete, verified responses without objections within two weeks of notice of entry of this order to the extent they have not already done so.
Mbazia's sanctions request is granted. Plaintiffs (jointly and severally) shall pay Mbazia $1943 in reasonable sanctions within 30 days of notice of entry of this order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”