| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To (1) Compel Responses To Requests For Production; And (2) For Sanctions Against Plaintiff And Her Counsel, Saunders & Associates, Apc
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Monday, December 15, 2025, Line 5. Defendant Peet's Coffee, Inc.'s 's Motion To (1) Compel Responses To Requests For Production; And (2) For Sanctions Against Plaintiff And Her Counsel is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Defendant moves under Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.310. This section applies only when further responses are sought. The relevant statute here is section 2031.300 The court finds the motion was timely filed and served. There is no contention that Defendant's RFPs addressed to Plaintiff Murielle Mutzel are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.)
Plaintiff has not established that she provided any responses to the RFPs prior to this motion. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.300.) Plaintiff's failure to timely provide responses is not excused. There is no duty to meet and confer prior to making a motion such as this. In any event, Defendant has demonstrated meet and confer efforts.
Plaintiff Murielle Mutzel shall serve verified, objection-free responses no later than December 30, 2025. Defendant's request for an order that Plaintiff produce all responsive documents by the same date is denied. Defendant did not cite section 2031.320, let alone demonstrate a basis for relief under it. In any event, currently the court sees no substantial basis for relief under section 2031,320.
The court does not find Plaintiff Murielle Mutzel and her counsel acted with substantial justification in connection with this discovery. Plaintiff Murielle Mutzel and her counsel Gary S. Saunders and Saunders & Associates, APC, jointly and severally, shall pay to Defendant, through counsel, $960 as sanctions, payment no later than January 6, 2026. (See Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, 2023.030, 2031.300(c).)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |