All cases
CAROLE COX ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT ET AL
Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Answers To Requests For Production Of Documents Set 3 In Violation Of This Court?S Order Of August 1
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
PlaintiffCAROLE COX
PlaintiffEDWARD COX
DefendantSAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Monday, December 29, 2025, Line 1. 2 - PLAINTIFF CAROLE COX, EDWARD COX Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Answers To Requests For Production Of Documents Set 3 In Violation Of This Courts Order Of August 1. Continued to January 9, 2026, per the moving party.=(302/JMQ) | |
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.