DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26635905·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing todayGRANTED

VISTACORE PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED VS. TERNWHEEL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Relieving Defendant Ternwheel, Inc. Of Waiver Of Objections To Form Interrogatories, Request For Admissions And Request For Production Of Documents

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffVISTACORE PARTNERS, LLC
DefendantTERNWHEEL, INC.

Ruling

Matter on the LAW AND MOTION / DISCOVERY Calendar for Tuesday August 25, 2026, line 12, 1 - DEFENDANT TERNWHEEL, INC.'S Motion For Order Relieving Defendant Ternwheel, Inc. Of Waiver Of Objections To Form Interrogatories, Request For Admissions And Request For Production Of Documents

Defendant Ternwheel Inc.'s motion for order relieving it of the waiver of objections to discovery is GRANTED.

For interrogatories and requests for production, the court may relieve a party from waiver if the party has served a response that is in "substantial compliance" with the applicable response requirements and the party's failure to serve a timely response resulted from "mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect." (CCP 2030.290(a)(1)-(2), 2031.300(a)(1)-(2).) The same standard applies to requests for admission: the Court may relieve a party from waiver if the party has served a proposed response that is in substantial compliance with section 2033.220 and the failure to serve a timely response resulted from mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. (CCP 2033.280(a)(1)-(2).)

Here, defendant shows that the failure to timely respond was the result of an excusable clerical error. (Sagheb Decl., par. 5) It has also provided discovery responses in substantial compliance with the Discovery Act. (Id. at Exs. G - I.)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (301/DH) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share