DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CECG00041·fresno·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayTo take off calendar.

In Re: Justin Antonio Kuripeth

Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
502
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJustin Antonio Kuripeth

Ruling

(49) Tentative Ruling

Re: In Re: Justin Antonio Kuripeth Superior Court Case No. 25CECG00041

Hearing Date: August 25, 2026 (Dept. 502)

Motion: Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim

Tentative Ruling:

To take off calendar.

Explanation:

On July 15, 2026, Petitioner’s motion to consolidate cases for all purposes for Case Nos. 25CECG00038, 25CECG00039, 25CECG00040, and 25CECG00041, with Case No. 25CECG00038 being designated as the master file was granted. Rules of Court, rule 3.350 (c) requires that after a motion to consolidate has been granted that “for all purposes including trial, any subsequent document must be filed only in the lead case.” Petitioner is required to file the petition and all other future documents related to Case No. 25CECG00041 in the master file, which is Case No. 25CECG00038. As the petition was filed in the wrong case after consolidation, the matter is taken off calendar.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: lmg on 8-21-26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share