PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25624689 - December 11, 2025 Hearing date: December 11, 2025 Case number: CGC25624689 Case title: SARAH GEROME VS. SIDE, INC. Case Number: | | CGC25624689 | Case Title: | | SARAH GEROME VS. SIDE, INC. | Court Date: | | 2025-12-11 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DISCOVERY MOTION IS TRANSFERRED TO DEPARTMENT 301 PER THE LOCAL RULES | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for December 11, 2025, line 3. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES.
Plaintiff Sarah Gerome's motion to compel further responses to her form interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for production of documents, and for sanctions, is continued for hearing to February 16, 2026, with directions to the parties.
Gerome's moving papers simply do not provide the court with enough information to decide the motion. She summarizes the responses by Side Inc. but does not attach the responses or include a separate statement setting out verbatim the requests, objections, and responses with reasons stating why the court should order a further response.
In addition, Gerome did not adequately meet and confer before filing a motion. Gerome sent an email on October 28 detailing the issues with Side's discovery responses. This was an adequate initial effort but she did not provide a reasonable period of time for Side to consider her contentions and make a response. Typically a week or two to respond is customary, especially where many items are at issue, and the court expects the parties to allow sufficient time in meet and confer efforts to avoid a motion where possible.
The court orders the parties to meet and confer telephonically or in person within two weeks about the discovery requests at issue. If items remain at issue, Gerome shall file a supplemental brief with a code-compliant separate statement within 9 court days of the continued hearing date. Side may file a supplemental opposition that may include an opposing separate statement no later than five court days in advance of the continued hearing date.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |