DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV22037·la·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 5 hoursGRANTED

Gomez, et al. v. Jones, et al.

Motions to Compel (3x)

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
310
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,000

Parties

PlaintiffCynthia Gomez
PlaintiffValerie Morales
DefendantRichelle Jones

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 310) August 26, 2026 DEPARTMENT 310 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS Submit on the tentative ruling by contacting the courtroom via email at [email protected] by no later than 4:00 p.m. the day before the hearing. Copy all parties on the email. The email subject line must state the case name and number, submitting or not submitting, hearing date and party type.

Judge Kevin C. Brazile Department 310 Hearing Date: August 26, 2026 Case Name: Gomez, et al. v. Jones, et al. Case No.: 24STCV22037 Matter: Motions to Compel (3x) Moving Party: Defendant Richelle Jones Responding Party: Unopposed Notice: OK Ruling: The Motions are granted. Moving party to give notice. The Court encourages all parties to appear remotely via LA CourtConnect. If submitting on the Court's tentative ruling, please follow the instructions provided above. Defendant Richelle Jones seeks to compel initial responses to her requests for production, special interrogatories, and form interrogatories from Plaintiff Cynthia Gomez, guardian ad litem for minor Valerie Morales.

Because responses were apparently not provided, the Motions are granted. Responses, without objections, are to be provided within 20 days. Plaintiff is sanctioned $1,000, which is to be paid within 30 days. Moving party to give notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share