DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000143·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayGRANTED

Estate of Hassan Ahmed Elgendy

Petition for letters of administration and authorization to administer under the independent administration of estates act

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
Dept. B
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 25, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherHassan Ahmed Elgendy

Ruling

Estate of Hassan Ahmed Elgendy 26PR000143

PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADMINISTER UNDER THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT

TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED. Michael Torr is appointed as probate referee. The matter is set for a Status Hearing Re: Final Distribution on August 25, 2027, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Status Hearing may be vacated or continued without appearances needed if, prior thereto, the personal representative files a petition for an order for final distribution or a report of status of administration pursuant to Probate Code section 12200. The clerk is directed to provide notice to the parties.

In The Matter of Fred A. Silva Bypass Trust 26PR000161

PETITION FOR AN ORDER CONFIRMING SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OR, ALTERNATIVELY, APPOINTING SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED.

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Maudie Pollastrini v. Auberge Resorts, LLC et al 24CV001401

[1] DEFENDANT AUBERGE RESORTS, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is CONTINUED to September 9, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.

Defendant Auberge Resorts LLC ("Auberge") moves, the Court for an Order compelling arbitration of the claims filed by Plaintiff Maudie Pollastrini ("Plaintiff").

[2] DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is CONTINUED to September 9, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.

Defendant Auberge Resorts LLC ("Auberge") demur, pursuant to California Code of Civil procedure section § 430.10, to Plaintiff Maudie Pollastrini's ("Plaintiff") First Amended Complaint.

6

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share