DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CL24-07258·solano·Civil·Contract
Hearing todayDENIED

CITIBANK, N.A. vs. PIERE P. JOUBERT

Motion to Enter Judgment Pursuant to the Stipulation

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
7
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCITIBANK, N.A.
DefendantPIERE P. JOUBERT

Ruling

DEPARTMENT SEVEN JUDGE TIM P. KAM 707-207-7307 TENTATIVE RULINGS SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2026 The parties may appear via Zoom with the exception of trials, trial management conferences, order for examinations and mandatory settlement conferences. The information for the Zoom meeting is set forth below.

The tentative ruling shall become the ruling of the court unless a party desiring to be heard contacts the judicial assistant of the department hearing the matter by 4:30 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing, and further advises that such party has notified the other side of its intention to request a hearing. A party requesting a hearing must notify all parties of the request to be heard by 4:30 p.m.

CITIBANK, N.A. vs. PIERE P. JOUBERT Case No. CL24-07258

Motion to Enter Judgment Pursuant to the Stipulation

Reflecting due process concerns, service of a motion affecting the rights of a defendant who has not appeared in an action typically is required to be made in the same manner as required for service of summons and complaint. See, e.g., applications for writs of attachment [C.C.P. §482.070(d)], and applications for writs of possession [C.C.P. §512.030(b)].

Defendant filed no responsive pleading in this action.

Plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice. Should Plaintiff seek to refile their motion, Plaintiff is directed to effect service of the motion papers in the same manner as required for service of summons and complaint.

Plaintiff is also reminded that costs must be claimed post-judgment, per CRC 3.1700.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share