DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV397661·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Shirley Long et al vs Barbara Kalman et al

Motion to Enforce Settlement

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 3, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 25, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 9:00 A.M. LINE 1 17CV311946 YCS Investments, Motion for Attorney’s Fees Incurred in Appeal No. H051381 Inc. vs County of OFF CALENDAR. On June 11, 2026, Moving party/ The County of Santa Clara Santa Clara filed a notice of withdrawal of this motion that was accompanied by a proof of service on that same day. LINE 2 21CV376417 Long Chen et al vs Motion to Set Asude Default/ Judgment John Ly et al Scroll down to Line 2 for Tentative Ruling. LINES 22CV397661 Shirley Long et al vs Motion to Enforce Settlement 3-4 Barbara Kalman et On December 17, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to enforce the al settlement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.

Plaintiff filed opposition papers. On February 3, 2026, the Plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement pursuant to section 664.6. Defendants filed opposition papers. Parties are ordered to meet-and-confer about the motions and discuss whether parties can reach a stipulation on terms and narrow the scope. Parties are to file a joint statement updating the court by August 31, 2026. The motions are CONTINUED to September 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 1. LINE 5 24CV429210 Neelima Naidu et al Motion Judgment on the Pleadings vs Deepika Jain et al Scroll down to Line 5 for Tentative Ruling.

LINE 6 24CV454827 American Express Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjunction National Bank vs Scroll down to Line 6 for Tentative Ruling. Abhisek Roy LINES 25CV473100 AB Landscaping, Demurrer (Line # 7) and Motion to Strike (Line #8) 7-8 Inc. vs Andrew J. Scroll down to Lines 7-8 for Tentative Ruling. Fry, et al LINE 9 25CV477635 Mid-Century Motion to Compel Verified Responses to Form Interrogoatires and Insurance Company Request for Sanctions vs Justin Collins Scroll down to Line 9 for Tentative Ruling.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share