Ramon Molina v. The People of California
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
CASE NO.: 25NWCV03245 HEARING: 08/25/2026 @ 9:30 a.m. #15 TENTATIVE ORDER The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The clerk will give notice.
Plaintiff Ramon Molina, in propria persona, filed this action against Defendant The People of California on September 12, 2025. The only allegation stated on the Judicial Council Form Complaint is that "Goverment enploees Implanted me with a Humen Hacking Devices from sheriffs."
The Court noted that there were no appearances entered at the Case Management Conferences held on February 3 and 4, 2026. The Court set an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions Plaintiff's Failure to Appear; Failure to File CMC Statement; Failure to File Proof of Service; Dismissal of Complaint and ordered Plaintiff to file a written response (OSC declaration) regarding the failure to appear, failure to file a Case Management Statement, and failure to file Proof of Service 5 days before the next court date. (2-4-26 Minute Order.)
At the hearing on May 4, 2026, the Court noted that no appearances were entered by the parties and that Defendant had not been served. The Court, on its own motion, set the matter for a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 438. The Order to Show Cause was continued to August 25, 2026.
As of August 25, 2026, Plaintiff has not filed any documents in response to the Court's order and has not filed proof of serving Defendant. According to Code of Civil Procedure section 438, subdivisions (b)(2) and (c)(3), "[t]he court may upon its own motion grant a motion for judgment on the pleadings" on the basis that "the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant."
Here, there are no causes of action specified on the Form Complaint and the allegations are composed of a single handwritten sentence. Plaintiff has not filed any papers to clarify the basis for his claims and, thus, has not shown that amendment will cure this defect. Accordingly, the Court's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.
TIRADO, ET AL.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”