DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22STCV19404·la·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing todayDENIED in part, and GRANTED in part.

Optiflex v. Rurng Larn Duh, et al.

Motions to Compel ANJ's Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set Two (#8050); Motion to Compel Discovery (CRS (#9689); Motion to Compel Responses to Production of Documents by ANJ (#1221); Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Luho Ting (#4151); Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted, ANJ (#4120); and Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions admitted Luho Ting (#0787)

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
224
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$595/hour$61$1,968

Parties

PlaintiffOptiflex
DefendantRurng Larn Duh
DefendantANJ Investments, LLC
DefendantLuho Ting

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 224) August 25, 2026 DEPARTMENT 224 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Motions to Compel ANJ's Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set Two (#8050); Motion to Compel Discovery (CRS (#9689); Motion to Compel Responses to Production of Documents by ANJ (#1221); Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Luho Ting (#4151); Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted, ANJ (#4120); and Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions admitted Luho Ting (#0787) are all DENIED in part, and GRANTED in part. They are DENIED as moot with respect to responses. All responses have been served. The motions are GRANTED with respect to sanctions as set forth below.

ANALYSIS

It is undisputed that Defendants ANJ Investments, LLC and Luho Ting have now served responses without objections to all six discovery motions on calendar today: Motions to Compel ANJ's Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set Two (#8050); Motion to Compel Discovery (CRS (#9689); Motion to Compel Responses to Production of Documents by ANJ (#1221); Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Luho Ting (#4151); Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted, ANJ (#4120); and Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions admitted Luho Ting (#0787.) The only issue remaining includes sanctions.

ANJ

As to the Motions to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted for ANJ, the Court awards the mandatory sanctions, but finds that amount requested unreasonable. As against ANJ Defendant and counsel, the Court awards 1 hour of time at counsel's hourly rate of $595/hour, plus the filing fee of $61. The motion was straightforward and no substantive opposition was filed. As to the other motions, the Court awards one hour of time for each motion, plus the filing fee, finding that the amount requested is unreasonable as these are straightforward motions. The Court awards sanctions against Defendant ANJ and its counsel of record jointly and severally in the total sum of $1,968 ($656 x 3).

Luho Ting

As to the Motions to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted for Luho Ting, the Court awards the mandatory sanctions, but finds that amount requested unreasonable. As against Defendant Luho Ting and counsel, the Court awards 1 hour of time at counsel's hourly rate of $595/hour, plus the filing fee of $61. The motion was straightforward and no substantive opposition was filed. As to the other motion, the Court awards one hour of time for each motion, plus the filing fee, finding that the amount requested is unreasonable as these are straightforward motions. The Court awards sanctions against Defendant Luho Ting and its counsel of record jointly and severally in the total sum of $1,968 ($656 x 3).

Conclusion

Motions to Compel ANJ's Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set Two (#8050); Motion to Compel Discovery (CRS (#9689); Motion to Compel Responses to Production of Documents by ANJ (#1221); Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Luho Ting (#4151); Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted, ANJ (#4120); and Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions admitted Luho Ting (#0787) are all DENIED in part, and GRANTED in part. They are DENIED as moot with respect to responses. All responses have been served. The motions are GRANTED with respect to sanctions as set forth above. These discovery sanctions are due within 30 days. Moving party to give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share