DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU305462·tulare-civil·Civil·Class Action
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Haley, Julissa Lenay vs. MWI Veterinary Supply Co.

Hearing re: Final Compliance

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 3, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJulissa Lenay Haley
DefendantMWI Veterinary Supply Co.

Ruling

Case No.: VCU305462 Date: August 25, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 2-The Honorable Bret D. Hillman Motion: Hearing re: Final Compliance Tentative Ruling: On August 10, 2026, the settlement administrator filed a declaration the deadline for the Participating Class Members to cash their settlement award check is September 6, 2026 and that on or around October 23, 2026, in accordance with the terms of the Parties' Settlement Agreement, the necessary paperwork and unclaimed funds will be sent to the California State Controller's Office - Unclaimed Property Fund.

Therefore, the Court continues this matter to November 3, 2026, 8:30 am, Dept. 7 as to the remaining uncashed checks and transmittal to the State Controller. If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division.

The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: Guerrero, Ana vs. Stillwater Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share