DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
200700284247PRCE·ventura·Probate·Conservatorship Review
Hearing todayStatus report reviewed and found complete. Proof of service to conservatee must be filed. Court Investigator's report must be filed.

In the Matter of Ashley Marie Eaton

Annual/Biennial Status Report Conservatorship Review

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 29, 2028
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentAshley Marie Eaton

Ruling

200700284247PRCE: In the Matter of Ashley Marie Eaton 08/25/2026 in Department J6 Hearing re: Annual/Biennial Status Report Conservatorship Review

The status report was filed on 7/9/26. The Court has reviewed the status report. It is complete. No appearance required.

The next biennial status report shall be served and filed by 7/24/28 and set for a hearing on 8/29/28 at 10:30 AM in Department J6. The next court investigator’s report shall be filed by 7/24/28. Ventura County Local Rule 10.02(J)(2) states that the “conservator must serve a copy of the status report to the individuals identified in Probate Code §2351.2(a)(2)(A) and file a proof of service.” As of 8/17/26 there is not a proof of service on file showing service to the conservatee. Conservator is ordered to serve the conservatee and file a proof of service. If not filed before the hearing, or the Court does not find good cause to waive it, the Court will continue this hearing to 9/29/26 at 10:30 a.m. in J6 in order for the proof of service to be filed.

Also, as of 4/15/26, the Court Investigator’s Report has not been filed. Unless the report is filed before the hearing, the Court intends to continue the hearing to 9/29/26 at 10:30 a.m. in J6.

The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share