DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23609401·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 8 months agoDENIED

J. DENNIS BONNEY VS. 1810 JACKSON STREET, A CONDOMINIUM ET AL

Motion to Compel Subsequent Depositions of Defendants Person Most Knowledgeable And Judy Hayes; Order Extending Discovery For Limited Purpose.

Hearing date
Jan 2, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJ. Dennis Bonney
PlaintiffVivian Kennedy
Defendant1810 Jackson Street, a Condominium
Defendant1810 Jackson Street Homeowners Association
DefendantJudy Hayes

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion and Discovery Calendar for Friday, January 2, 2026, Line 2, PLAINTIFF VIVIAN KENNEDY'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE FURTHER DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT 1810 JACKSON STREET HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S PERSON MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE AND JUDY HAYES.

The motion by plaintiff Vivian Kennedy to compel subsequent depositions of Judy Hayes and the PMK for 1810 Jackson Street is denied. The court finds no good cause.

As to the PMK, Kennedy's moving papers make conclusory arguments about the importance of the late-produced documents and appear to rest on the assertion that there must be a deposition to cover any produced document. Kennedy does not attach the documents to her moving papers or describe why there is good cause for testimony concerning them. The HOA persuasively argues that they are sufficiently cumulative of other documents previously produced.

As to Hayes, Kennedy's moving papers articulate no connection between Hayes and the late-produced documents.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share