DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV424421·santaclara·Civil·Construction
Hearing in about 7 hoursOFF CALENDAR

City of Santa Clara v. Bogard Construction, Inc., et al.

Motion for Leave to File Complaint-In-Intervention

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCity of Santa Clara
DefendantBogard Construction, Inc.

Ruling

9:00 25CV465609 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Order on Plaintiff Wells Fargo 6 v. Bank’s Motion to deem Plaintiff’s Yvonne Trigos Request for Admissions, Set One, Admitted by Defendant

See Line 6 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 25CV477349 Lal Rai Order on Defendant Hoblit Motors 7 v. Ford’s Motion to Compel Arbitration Ford Motor Company, et al. and Stay Action

See Line 7 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 23CV424421 City of Santa Clara Order on Lexington Insurance 8 v. Company’s Motion for Leave to File Bogard Construction, Inc., et al. Complaint-In-Intervention

At the request of the moving party, this Motion is OFF CALENDER.

SO ORDERED.

9:00 24CV453662 Santos Medina Order on Plaintiff Medina’s Motion to 9 v. Vacate the June 4, 2025 Order SF Green Construction Inc., Compelling Arbitration of claims et al. against Defendant Solar Mosaic LLC.

See Line 9 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 10

Line 8 Case Name: City of Santa Clara v. Bogard Construction, Inc., et al.

Case No.: 23CV424421

See Order above. (At the request of the moving party, this Motion is OFF CALENDER.)

39

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share