Lloyd Baylis et al. v. Ted Ricks et al.

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 25, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 8 25CV460436 Fang Xia v. Park See LINE 7. Townsend Homeowners Association Line 9 25CV467887 Lloyd Baylis et al. v. Ted Defendant TLR Masonry’s motion to set aside court default. Ricks et al. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) The court continued this motion from its original date because defendant had not included a proposed responsive pleading. Defendant has not lodged a proposed pleading (the clerk’s office rejected a filing by defendant). The court will continue this motion one more time to allow defendant to file and serve an updated declaration with the proposed responsive pleading attached.

The court will deny the motion if defendant does not follow those instructions by the next hearing. The motion is continued to October 1, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. Defendant is ordered to file and serve an updated declaration with a proposed responsive pleading attached no later than September 14, 2026. Defendant is ordered to provide notice of the continued motion hearing. The court will prepare the order. Line 10 26CV488025 Thomas Huang et al. v. Click LINE 10 or scroll down for ruling.

Fidelity National Title Company et al. - oo0oo - 9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 24CV443056 Amzur Technologies, Inc. and Order of examination: parties ordered to appear. BIZTINTEX, Inc. v. SSIT Inc. Line 2 26CV486976 Sadia Nadeem v. American Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw: parties ordered to Honda Motor Co., Inc. appear.

- oo0oo -

4