Fang Xia v. Park Townsend Homeowners Association

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 25, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 5 24CV445456 North Mill Equipment Plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant Ryan Peacock’s initial Finance, LLC et al. v. responses to form interrogatories, requests for production, and Ryan Peacock et al. requests for admission. Notice is proper, and the motion is unopposed. The motion includes a declaration from counsel (with exhibits attached), but does not include a memorandum of points and authorities. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new motion with supporting argument.

The court will prepare the order. Line 6 25CV457782 Ilya Rosenberg v. Sensel, Click LINE 6 or scroll down for ruling. Inc. et al. Line 7 25CV460436 Fang Xia v. Park Plaintiff’s motions to compel further responses to requests for Townsend Homeowners production, set two, and special interrogatories, set two. Notice Association is proper, and the motions are opposed by defendant. The court has ordered the parties to submit all discovery disputes to a discovery facilitator. To prepare for the discovery facilitator, the parties are ordered to meet and confer in person, by telephone, or by videoconference before meeting with the facilitator, to attempt to informally resolve all pending discovery issues.

To provide time for that process to occur, all pending discovery motions are CONTINUED to January 26, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. That includes: the two motions currently scheduled for August 25, 2026; defendant’s request for a protective order currently scheduled for October 13, 2026; and plaintiff’s discovery motion currently scheduled for November 24, 2026. The parties must file a joint statement of no more than six pages, no later than January 5, 2027. The joint statement must identify any remaining items in dispute.

The court will prepare the order.

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 25, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 8 25CV460436 Fang Xia v. Park See LINE 7. Townsend Homeowners Association Line 9 25CV467887 Lloyd Baylis et al. v. Ted Defendant TLR Masonry’s motion to set aside court default. Ricks et al. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) The court continued this motion from its original date because defendant had not included a proposed responsive pleading. Defendant has not lodged a proposed pleading (the clerk’s office rejected a filing by defendant). The court will continue this motion one more time to allow defendant to file and serve an updated declaration with the proposed responsive pleading attached.

The court will deny the motion if defendant does not follow those instructions by the next hearing. The motion is continued to October 1, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. Defendant is ordered to file and serve an updated declaration with a proposed responsive pleading attached no later than September 14, 2026. Defendant is ordered to provide notice of the continued motion hearing. The court will prepare the order. Line 10 26CV488025 Thomas Huang et al. v. Click LINE 10 or scroll down for ruling.

Fidelity National Title Company et al. - oo0oo - 9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 24CV443056 Amzur Technologies, Inc. and Order of examination: parties ordered to appear. BIZTINTEX, Inc. v. SSIT Inc. Line 2 26CV486976 Sadia Nadeem v. American Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw: parties ordered to Honda Motor Co., Inc. appear.

- oo0oo -

4