DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
17CV311946·santaclara·Civil·Attorney's Fees
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR

YCS Investments, Inc. vs County of Santa Clara

Motion for Attorney’s Fees Incurred in Appeal No. H051381

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 25, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 9:00 A.M. LINE 1 17CV311946 YCS Investments, Motion for Attorney’s Fees Incurred in Appeal No. H051381 Inc. vs County of OFF CALENDAR. On June 11, 2026, Moving party/ The County of Santa Clara Santa Clara filed a notice of withdrawal of this motion that was accompanied by a proof of service on that same day. LINE 2 21CV376417 Long Chen et al vs Motion to Set Asude Default/ Judgment John Ly et al Scroll down to Line 2 for Tentative Ruling. LINES 22CV397661 Shirley Long et al vs Motion to Enforce Settlement 3-4 Barbara Kalman et On December 17, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to enforce the al settlement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.

Plaintiff filed opposition papers. On February 3, 2026, the Plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement pursuant to section 664.6. Defendants filed opposition papers. Parties are ordered to meet-and-confer about the motions and discuss whether parties can reach a stipulation on terms and narrow the scope. Parties are to file a joint statement updating the court by August 31, 2026. The motions are CONTINUED to September 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 1. LINE 5 24CV429210 Neelima Naidu et al Motion Judgment on the Pleadings vs Deepika Jain et al Scroll down to Line 5 for Tentative Ruling.

LINE 6 24CV454827 American Express Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjunction National Bank vs Scroll down to Line 6 for Tentative Ruling. Abhisek Roy LINES 25CV473100 AB Landscaping, Demurrer (Line # 7) and Motion to Strike (Line #8) 7-8 Inc. vs Andrew J. Scroll down to Lines 7-8 for Tentative Ruling. Fry, et al LINE 9 25CV477635 Mid-Century Motion to Compel Verified Responses to Form Interrogoatires and Insurance Company Request for Sanctions vs Justin Collins Scroll down to Line 9 for Tentative Ruling.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share