DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV178593·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing todayCONTINUED

BORNSTEIN vs KING

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
22
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 8, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffBORNSTEIN
DefendantKING

Ruling

26CV178593: BORNSTEIN vs KING 08/25/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 22

Tentative Ruling - 08/21/2026 Han N. Tran

The Court orders the following after review of the case.

The Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 08/25/2026 is continued to 12/08/2026 at 3:00 PM in Department 22 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

California Rules of Court, rule 3.110(b) requires the summons and complaint be served on all defendants and proofs of service filed with the court within 60 days of filing the complaint. This complaint was filed on 3/25/26, and proofs of service should have been filed by now.

Plaintiff's Case Management Statement claims that defendant was served, but no proof of service has been filed.

Plaintiff is ORDERED to perfect service on all defendants before the next hearing date.

Summons and complaint must be served and proofs of service filed before the next Case Management Conference Statements are due. Failure to do so may result in an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE in re $500 SANCTIONS and/or DISMISSAL for failure to comply with Cal. Rules of Court, failure to timely serve summons and complaint, and failure to comply with the orders of this court.

The parties shall file updated Case Management Statements in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.725, on Judicial Council Form CM-110, no later than 15 calendar days before the hearing. If the foregoing date is a court holiday or a weekend, the time is extended to the next business day.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record.

*******************************************************************

IF YOU DO NOT CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IF NO OTHER PARTY CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO ATTEND THE HEARING AND THE COURT WILL AFFIRM THE TENTATIVE RULING.

IF YOU DO CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING, FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE BELOW:

THROUGH eCOURT 26CV178593: BORNSTEIN vs KING 08/25/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 22 Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps:

1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search” 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling” 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select “Proceed”

BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK (dept22@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.

Notice via BOTH eCourt AND email is required. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no party contests the tentative ruling.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share