REIKES, et al. vs BLOCK DRUG COMPANY, INC., et al.
Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time; Motion for Relief from Inadvertent Waiver of Discovery Responses & Objections
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
25CV157993: REIKES, et al. vs BLOCK DRUG COMPANY, INC., et al. 08/25/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time on J&J Defendants Motion for Relief from Inadvertent Waiver of Discovery Responses & Objections Under Code Civ. Pro. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a), and § 2033.280(a). (034919923254.) CRS# A-157993-002 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 08/24/2026 Patrick McKinney
Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Pecos River Talc LLC's (J&J Defendants) ex parte application for an order shortening the time to hear J&J Defendants Motion for Relief From Inadvertent Waiver of Discovery Responses & Objections is GRANTED.
The Hearing on Motion - Other DEFENDANTS JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND PECOS RIVER TALC LLCs MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM INADVERTENT WAIVER OF DISCOVERY RESPONSES & OBJECTIONS UNDER Code Civ. Pro. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a), and § 2033.280(a); filed by JOHNSON & JOHNSON (Defendant) + CRS# 034919923254 scheduled for 09/15/2026 is reset to 09/03/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.
Any opposition shall be filed and served no later than 12:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 1, 2026 with a courtesy copy sent by email to Department 18. Any reply may be presented orally at the hearing.
Counsel for the J&J Defendants must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.
CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”