DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCL316293·tulare-civil·Civil·Collection
Hearing todayGRANTED

Wells Fargo Bank, NA vs. Pearce, Chloe A

Motion to Set Aside Dismissal and Enter Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,823.00$315$6,786.27$754.27$754.00$5,278.27

Parties

PlaintiffWells Fargo Bank, NA
DefendantPearce, Chloe A

Ruling

rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Re: Wells Fargo Bank, NA vs. Pearce, Chloe A Case No.: VCL316293 Date: August 24, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 9-The Honorable Nathan D. Ide Motion: Motion to Set Aside Dismissal and Enter Judgment Tentative Ruling: To grant the motion and enter judgment as requested

Facts In this collection matter, Plaintiff filed a stipulation resolving this matter for the principal amount of $6,786.27 and that this amount would be paid via monthly installments as follows: (A) $754.27 shall be paid on or before May 02, 2025; (B) $754.00 shall be paid on or before the 2nd of each and every consecutive month commencing on or before June 02, 2025 through and including December 02, 2025; (C) $754.00 shall be paid on or before January 02, 2026.

In the event of default, the stipulation indicates that Plaintiff is entitled to entry of judgment for the judgment amount noted above as well as costs, less any credits. The stipulation indicates that the Court shall retain jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.

On May 21, 2025, this matter was dismissed pursuant to the stipulation. Plaintiff indicates that Defendant has made payments totaling $5,278.27, but has failed to make any payments thereafter and is in breach of the stipulation.

Authority and Analysis Section 664.6 (a) states: "If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement."

"The court's retention of jurisdiction under section 664.6 includes jurisdiction over both the parties and the case itself, that is, both personal and subject matter jurisdiction." (Lofton v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (2014) 230 Cal.App.4 th 1050, 1061.)

"Section 664.6 permits the trial court judge to enter judgment on a settlement agreement without the need for a new lawsuit." (Osumi v. Sutton (2007) 151 Cal.App.4 th 1355, 1360.)

Therefore, the Court exercises jurisdiction over this dismissed matter pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, having found the parties have sufficiently stipulated to this continuing jurisdiction for purposes of entering this settlement as a judgment.

Defendant appears to have breached the settlement, based upon the declaration of Plaintiff's counsel and, the Court, having no opposition, grants the motion and enters judgment in the amount requested of $1,823.00, consisting of the $6,786.27 principal amount, less $5,278.27 in payments made, plus $315 in costs.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share