DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PB-0032989·shasta·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayInventory accepted; Status of Administration CONTINUED

ESTATE OF STEVEN PROVENCHER

Confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal; Status of Administration

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 5, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$250.00

Parties

RespondentSteven Provencher

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0032989

This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal. The Final Inventory and Appraisal filed on August 17, 2026, is accepted by the Court.

This matter is also on calendar for Status of Administration. No Petition for Final Distribution has been filed. No Status Report has been filed. This matter is continued to Monday, October 5, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for Status of Administration. If a Petition for Final Distribution cannot be filed prior to the next hearing, the Court ORDERS the Personal Representative to timely file and serve a Status Report with proper Notice of Hearing in compliance with Probate Code Section 12200 et seq.

Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re: Monetary Sanctions of $250.00 for failure to timely close the estate administration and failure to comply with the Court’s order. If a properly noticed Status Report or Petition for Final Distribution is noticed for a different date, the Court will vacate the October 5, 2026, date. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF MILDRED TRELOAR

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share