Haber v. Paolini
Motion to strike complaint; Demurrer
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT ON COMPLAINT FOR CVPS2603003 HABER VS PAOLINI OTHER REAL PROPERTY (OVER $35,000) OF MELANIE HABER BY AS TO Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing is continued to 9.29.26 to be heard concurrently with demurrer and motion to strike by Paolini Defendants.
5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT FOR OTHER REAL CVPS2603003 HABER VS PAOLINI PROPERTY (OVER $35,000) OF MELANIE HABER COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing is continued to 9.29.26 to be heard concurrently with demurrer and motion to strike by Paolini Defendants.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”