DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR0203·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayGRANTED

ESTATE OF JANETH WILLIAMS

LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 23, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$375,000

Ruling

August 24, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

5. 26PR0203 ESTATE OF JANETH WILLIAMS LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION

Decedent died intestate on March 9, 2026, survived by issue of deceased parents. Petitioner is decedent’s sibling. The Petition requests full authority under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. The Petition states that bond be fixed at $375,000. A Duties/Liabilities statement (DE 147/DE 147s) was filed on July 9, 2026. Proof of service of notice of the hearing on the Petition was filed on July 24, 2026. A Declaration of Diligent Search and Request to Dispense with Notice was filed on August 6, 2026, indicating notice has not been provided to Edsel Murdock, sibling of decedent, as he has been missing since 2019.

Proof of publication was filed on August 12, 2026. TENTATIVE RULING #5: ABSENT OBJECTION THE PETITION IS GRANTED AS REQUESTED. ANY PERSON WHO HAS AN OBJECTION MAY MAKE IT ANY TIME, EVEN ORALLY AT THE HEARING (PROBATE CODE § 1043). A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, AUGUST 23, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING. IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR BY ZOOM, PLEASE CONTACT THE COURT AT (530) 621-5867 AND MEETING INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED.

4

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share