RYAN FARR v. CESALEE VENEMA

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 RYAN FARR,) Case Number: FDI-16-785725) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: August 25, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CESALEE VENEMA,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) Petitioner Ryan Farr (Father) and Respondent Cesalee Venema (Mother) have two minor children 18 together, Tanner (DOB 9/20/2009, age 16) and Scarlett (DOB 3/27/2012, age 14).

Mother has 19 parenting time on alternating weekends from Friday school pick up to Sundays at 3pm (drop off 20 at Father’s home, curbside). 21 2) The matter is on for a review hearing. The Court ordered the parties to file and serve update 22 declarations at least 10 days before the review hearing. It appears Father attempted to file an 23 update declaration but did not file the declaration after it was rejected for filing. Mother has not 24 filed an update declaration. 25 B. Findings and Orders 26 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 27 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.

A violation of this order may subject the party in 28 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 29 children is the United States.

1 2) Neither party has requested modification of the current custody and parenting time orders. All 2 prior orders shall therefore remain in place, and no further review hearings will be set at this time. 3 If either party has any new custody or parenting time requests, they may file a new request for 4 order.

5 3) Father’s attorney shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 6 4) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 7 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 8 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 9 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 10 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 11 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 12 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d).

16

20

24

28

29