DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23NWLC32008·la·Civil·Contract
Hearing todayGRANTED

TD BANK USA, N.A. v. CINDY GARCIA

Motion to set aside order of dismissal and enter judgment

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
Y
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,845.00$1,935.57$3,780.57$363.00$1,845.00$2,298.57

Parties

PlaintiffTD BANK USA, N.A.
DefendantCINDY GARCIA

Ruling

(Norwalk Courthouse: Dept. Y) August 24, 2026 DEPARTMENT Y LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

vs CINDY GARCIA Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff TD Bank USA, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration.

The Court takes judicial notice of the Conditional Stipulated Settlement Agreement signed by Defendant on January 9, 2024 and filed with the Court on January 12, 2024. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Order Dismissing Without Prejudice and Retaining Jurisdiction Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 664.6 entered by the Court on January 17, 2024.

The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $1,845.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $1,935.57 due and owing.

Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Order dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff TD Bank USA, N.A. and against Defendant Cindy Garcia for the principal sum of $3,780.57, plus court costs of $363.00, less credits of $1,845.00 for a total judgment of $2,298.57. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice.

Case Number: 25NWLC34356 Hearing Date: August 24, 2026 Dept: Y 25NWLC34356: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. vs NATHAN CORPENING Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration.

The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement signed by Defendant on August 19, 2025 and filed with the Court on September 11, 2025. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Order Dismissing Without Prejudice and Retaining Jurisdiction Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 664.6 entered by the Court on September 19, 2025.

The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $1,866.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $2,268.20 due and owing.

Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Order Dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. and against Defendant Nathan Corpening for the principal sum of $3,454.20 plus court costs of $353.00, less credits of $1,186.00 for a total judgment of $2,621.20. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share