DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
201700495761PRCE·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoThe court intends to hold a hearing as to the evidence re whether the petition or request is frivolous or solely intended to abuse, intimidate, or cause unnecessary delay.

In The Matter of Joshua Dana Saeta

Motion for Attorney Fees/Costs

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJoshua Dana Saeta
RespondentAnthony Stracke

Attorneys

Anthony Strackefor Respondent

Ruling

201700495761PRCE: In The Matter of Joshua Dana Saeta 05/19/2026 in Department J6 Motion for Attorney Fees/Costs

Anthony Stracke was a “prevailing party” for purposes of this motion. Therefore, after notice and a hearing, the court, upon request, may issue an order for the payment of attorney's fees and costs for a prevailing respondent only if the respondent establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the petition or request is frivolous or solely intended to abuse, intimidate, or cause unnecessary delay. (Family Code §6344(b))

The court intends to hold a hearing as to the evidence re whether the petition or request is frivolous or solely intended to abuse, intimidate, or cause unnecessary delay.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share