DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
201600487488PRCP·ventura·Probate·Conservatorship Review
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

In the Matter of Dae’yon L Rutledge

Annual/Biennial Status Report Conservatorship Review

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 30, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherDae’yon L Rutledge

Ruling

201600487488PRCP: In the Matter of Dae'yon L Rutledge 05/19/2026 in Department J6 Hearing re: Annual/Biennial Status Report Conservatorship Review

The Status Report was filed on 2/4/26 but no proof of service filed as of 05/18/26. The conservator must serve a copy of the status report to the individuals identified in Probate Code §2351.2(a)(2)(A) and file a proof of service unless the Court finds good cause to waive it. Otherwise, the Court continues the hearing to 06/30/26 at 10:30 a.m. in Department J6 for filing of proof of service.

The Status Report was filed on 2/4/26 and it is complete. No appearance is necessary.

Conservator’s biennial status report was due 02/02/26 and filed on 02/04/26. The Court has reviewed the status report and it is complete.

CI states this case was placed on a biennial review schedule on March 12, 2024.

There does not appear to be an order re biennial review schedule in this matter on 03/12/24. Further, a CI report was filed 03/05/25.

Unless the Court orders biennial review, the CI is to file its next report on or before 02/02/27.

The next biennial status report shall be filed on or before 02/02/28, and set for filing/sufficiency hearing on 03/14/28, 10:30 AM, J6.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share