DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV002678·sacramento·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

WANSOR, et al. vs ALLIANCE RV, LLC A CORPORATION, et al.

Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice as to Sophia Vander Kooy

Hearing date
Jul 20, 2026
Department
8C
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 24, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJeffrey Wansor
PlaintiffGeorgette Wansor
DefendantAlliance RV, LLC
DefendantRV Retailer Folsom Lake, LLC dba Blue Compass RV
DefendantLippert Components, Inc.

Ruling

25CV002678: WANSOR, et al. vs ALLIANCE RV, LLC A CORPORATION, et al. 07/20/2026 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice as to Sophia Vander Kooy in Department 8C

Tentative Ruling

NOTICE:

Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure:

To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Department 8C Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-8380 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message: a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing party may appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below. If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court.

Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by video conference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court will presume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings.

The Department 8C Zoom Link is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16039062174 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 160 3906 2174. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALL APPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED.

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed on the Court Reporter Services webpage available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://saccourt.ca.gov/general-information/court-reporter-services-transcripts. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://saccourt.ca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/227/639084034465370000.

A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list.

25CV002678: WANSOR, et al. vs ALLIANCE RV, LLC A CORPORATION, et al. 07/20/2026 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice as to Sophia Vander Kooy in Department 8C

Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

TENTATIVE RULING

***NOTICE: EFFECTIVE APRIL 13, 2026, THIS DEPARTMENT HAS MOVED TO THE TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 500 G STREET SACRAMENTO, CA. ALL MOTIONS NOTICED FOR DEPARTMENT 28 WILL BE HEARD IN DEPARTMENT 8C OF THE NEW COURTHOUSE. ALL PAPERS FOR THIS DEPARTMENT MUST BE FILED AT THIS NEW LOCATION AND WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AT THE HALL OF JUSTICE. ALL HEARINGS WILL TAKE PLACE AT THIS NEW LOCATION***

Defendant Lippert Components, Inc.’s (“Lippert”) application for an order admitting Sophia Vander Kooy as counsel pro hac vice is CONTINUED to August 24, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 8C.

Rule 9.40(c)(1) of the California Rules of Court provides:

A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1013a of a copy of the application and of the notice of hearing of the application on all parties who have appeared in the cause and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office. The notice of hearing must be given at the time prescribed in Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 unless the court has prescribed a shorter period.

(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(c)(1), emphasis added.)

Lippert’s proof of service states that the application was served on Plaintiffs Jeffrey Wansor and Georgette Wansor (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) via electronic service. The proof of service also states that the application was uploaded to the State Bar’s website through its online application portal. The proof of service does not show that service was made in any manner on Defendants Alliance RV, LLC (“Alliance”) and RV Retailer Folsom Lake, LLC dba Blue Compass RV

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

25CV002678: WANSOR, et al. vs ALLIANCE RV, LLC A CORPORATION, et al. 07/20/2026 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice as to Sophia Vander Kooy in Department 8C

(“Blue Compass”), who appeared in this action on June 11, 2025 when they filed their Answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Rule 9.40(c)(1) requires the application be filed with a proof of service by mail showing service on all parties who have appeared and the State Bar. The implication from this rule is that a pro hac vice application must be served by mail, not only on the State Bar but also on all other parties who have appeared, and that electronic service alone is insufficient. Thus, Lippert’s proof of service fails to comply with Rule 9.40(c)(1) and does not establish effective service of the application.

Lippert is directed to serve, by mail, the application papers, along with an amended notice of the continued hearing date, on Plaintiffs, Alliance, Blue Compass, and the State Bar at its San Francisco office, and to file proof of service that complies with Code of Civil Procedure section 1013(a), by no later than July 23, 2026. The amended notice shall include information regarding the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 1.06(D).

On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice as to Sophia Vander Kooy scheduled for 07/20/2026 is continued to 08/24/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 8C at Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share