DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF26519730·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing in 2 daysPetitioner's petition to compel and request for sanctions is denied as moot without prejudice. Treasury Prime's request for sanctions is granted in part; Petitioner must pay $2,290.

IN RE: NATHANIEL ORMOND

Petition to Compel Compliance and to Compel Further Responses by Third-Party Treasury Prime Inc. to Subpoena; Request for Sanctions against Treasury Prime

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,290

Parties

DefendantNathaniel Ormond
OtherTreasury Prime Inc.

Attorneys

Phillip I. Kanarshfor Nathaniel Ormond

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Monday, August 24, 2026, Line 3, PETITIONER NATHANIEL ORMOND's Petition By Defendant And Cross-complaintant Nathaniel Ormond To Compel Compliance And To Compel Further Responses By Third-Party Treasury Prime Inc. To The Subpoena For Production Of Business Records; Request For Sanctions Against Treasury Prime. (Complete tentative ruling emailed to the parties).

Petitioner Nathan Ormond's petition to compel further responses to his subpoena to third-party Treasury Prime Inc. and request for monetary sanctions is denied as moot without prejudice to filing a motion after the parties have engaged in meaningful meet and confer efforts and reached an impasse. Treasury Prime's request for monetary sanctions is granted in part. No later than September 30, 2026 Ormond must pay $2,290 to Treasury Prime in reasonable monetary sanctions.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share